Sustainability, Vol. 17, Pages 11290: Modulating Secondary Metabolite Content in Olive Leaves Through Foliar Application of Biochar and Olive Leaf-Based Phenolic Extracts

Fuente: Sustainability - Revista científica (MDPI)
Sustainability, Vol. 17, Pages 11290: Modulating Secondary Metabolite Content in Olive Leaves Through Foliar Application of Biochar and Olive Leaf-Based Phenolic Extracts
Sustainability doi: 10.3390/su172411290
Authors:
Mario Franić
Igor Palčić
Šime Marcelić
Nikola Major
Dean Ban
Tvrtko Karlo Kovačević
Dominik Anđelini
Melissa Prelac
Danko Cvitan
Smiljana Goreta Ban
Zoran Užila
Marija Polić Pasković
Igor Pasković

This research focuses on the additional valorization of olive leaves, a by-product of regular olive pruning, by increasing their secondary metabolite content through the combined application of biochar and a phenolic extract from olive leaves. A suspension of biochar, obtained by the pyrolysis of grapevine pruning residues, was prepared by mixing it in demineralized water (1.5 g; 5 L; 24 h). The phenolic extract was obtained by extracting lyophilized and ground olive leaves in demineralized water (50 g; 5 L; 24 h), while the combined preparation was obtained in an analogous manner (1.5 g biochar; 50 g olive leaf powder; 5 L water; 24 h). Treatments were applied at the beginning of July, 50 days after anthesis (May 16th) and included the following: (i) control treatment (demineralized water), (ii) biochar solution, (iii) phenolic extract solution, and (iv) a combined aqueous preparation of biochar and phenolic extract, all with the addition of a wetting agent. Trees of the olive cultivars Leccino and Istarska bjelica were sprayed with the corresponding preparation until runoff. Olive leaves were sampled three weeks after treatment (July 26th) and, after washing and drying, and were prepared for LC-MSMS analysis. Both biochar-based treatments induced the most potent effects, although responses differed between cultivars. In particular, apigenin derivatives, hydroxytyrosol, luteolin-7-rutinoside, and the secoiridoid oleacein showed apparent differences between biochar treatments and the control. Overall, higher concentrations of the sum of detected secoiridoids were observed in the leaf samples of ‘Istarska bjelica’ under BCH and BCH+PH treatments, whereas no such differences were found for ‘Leccino’ cultivar. Further research is needed to clarify the cultivar-dependent response of secondary metabolism in these olive cultivars and the mechanisms by which biochar foliar application modulates metabolite profiles.