Fuente: PubMed "Cannabis" medRxiv [Preprint]. 2026 Apr 6:2026.04.03.26350120. doi: 10.64898/2026.04.03.26350120.ABSTRACTIMPORTANCE: Understanding patterns of substance use and environmental exposures to tobacco, cannabis, and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among youth is critical for developing targeted prevention strategies, particularly as co-use of tobacco, ENDS, and cannabis becomes more prevalent.OBJECTIVE: To identify latent classes of tobacco, ENDS, and cannabis use, and environmental exposures to these products among adolescents and emerging adults.DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium (3rd data release, 2018-2022) were analyzed from March 2025-January 2026. The sample ( N =2,786) included early adolescents (ages 11-13; n =226, 7.9%), middle adolescents (ages 14-17; n =1,248, 43.4%), and late adolescents/emerging adults (ages 18-24; n =1,402, 48.7%) from 19 ECHO cohorts.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The Youth Risk Behavior Survey-Substance Use module measured experimental and current use of cannabis, ENDS, and tobacco products, as well as daily environmental exposure to tobacco smoke, nicotine aerosols, and cannabis smoke within home and social contexts. A multiple-group latent class analysis was used to identify distinct latent classes of substance use and environmental exposure to tobacco smoke, nicotine aerosols, and cannabis smoke and compared class prevalences across early, middle, and late adolescence.RESULTS: Four latent classes were identified, including: No Use/No Exposure (53%), No Use, Polyexposure (10%), Experimental Use/Low Exposure (22%), and Polysubstance Use/High Polyexposure (14%). Cannabis was the most used substance (34% experimental or current use) and the most common source of environmental exposure (20%), followed by ENDS use (26% experimental or current use; 19% environmental exposure) and combustible tobacco (15% use; 19% environmental exposure). The No Use/No Exposure and No Use/Polyexposure classes were primarily made up of early and middle-aged adolescents, whereas the Experimental Use/Low Exposure and Polysubstance Use/High Polyexposure classes primarily consisted of late adolescents and emerging adults.CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed distinct, developmentally patterned groupings of substance use and environmental exposure among US adolescents and emerging adults, highlighting the need for developmentally tailored interventions, messaging, and policies that address both active use and environmental exposure across adolescence.KEY POINTS: Question: Has the rise in the use of cannabis and electronic nicotine delivery systems led to increased environmental exposure to their emissions among adolescents and young adults?Findings: Our multiple-group latent class analysis of the ECHO cohort ( N = 2,786; ages 11-24) identified four latent classes related to substance use and environmental exposure: No Use/No Exposure (53%), No Use/Polyexposure (10%), Experimental Use/Low Exposure (22%), and Polysubstance Use/High Polyexposure (14%). Younger adolescents primarily belonged to the no-use classes, whereas older adolescents and emerging adults were predominantly classified within the experimental and polysubstance use groups. Meaning: Our findings indicate that the prevalence of co-exposures has risen alongside increased co-use and highlight the critical importance of implementing age-specific prevention and harm reduction strategies that address both individual use and environmental exposure.PMID:42006792 | PMC:PMC13086085 | DOI:10.64898/2026.04.03.26350120