Sustainability, Vol. 18, Pages 4005: Responsible AI Integration in STEM Higher Education: Advancing Sustainable Development Goals

Fuente: Sustainability - Revista científica (MDPI)
Sustainability, Vol. 18, Pages 4005: Responsible AI Integration in STEM Higher Education: Advancing Sustainable Development Goals
Sustainability doi: 10.3390/su18084005
Authors:
Adel R. Althubyani

Artificial intelligence has been considered as a transformative element capable of reshaping STEM education into equitable, resource-efficient, and scalable learning environments. However, realizing this potential requires striking a careful balance between technological innovation, pedagogical considerations, and ethical concerns. This study sought to examine the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools by STEM university faculty members in Saudi Arabia to promote Sustainable Development Goal 4 (quality education). While doing so, the study attempted to explore how Saudi STEM university faculty members integrated AI tools in their instructional practices and analyze their perceptions towards these tools. To achieve these goals, the study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. In the first phase of data collection, a close-ended questionnaire was applied to a random sample of (324) STEM university faculty members. The second phase involved gathering qualitative data using a semi-structured interview administered to 12 purposively selected experts. Key quantitative findings revealed an overall AI integration at a medium level with a mean of (2.71) and standard deviation of (0.36) across three instructional practices, namely planning, implementation, and assessment. The highest integration level was in assessment (M = 2.93, medium) while the lowest was in planning (M = 2.61, medium). The results also revealed that the participants’ perceptions towards integrating AI tools were highly positive (M = 4.00, high), albeit with some concerns regarding the effect of excessive and unguided use of AI tools on students’ higher-order thinking skills, particularly the risk of AI functioning merely as an information delivery mechanism rather than serving its more pedagogically valuable role as a brainstorming scaffold. Furthermore, the study unveiled a number of barriers to integrating AI tools, including the weakness of digital infrastructure, lack of professional development, the limited credibility of AI-generated content, and ethical concerns related to academic integrity and copyrights. The research suggests the establishment of a sustainable digital environment by improving the infrastructure, providing specific training in accordance with the principles of sustainability, and implementing policies that promote equitable, transparent, and responsible integration of AI. These strategies can coordinate the growth of technology with the larger needs of the quality of education, inclusion, and sustainability of STEM education in the long term.