Fuente:
Sustainability - Revista científica (MDPI)
Sustainability, Vol. 18, Pages 1952: Sustainable Conversion of Household Organic Residues into Biochars: Physicochemical Characterization and Process Comparison
Sustainability doi: 10.3390/su18041952
Authors:
Leticia Perez-Rial
Rocio Maceiras
Jose Luis Salgueiro
Maria Justicia
Organic residues from households and food-service facilities, such as orange peels, spent coffee grounds, banana peels and potato skins, represent abundant biomass resources that can release undesirable compounds during degradation. Their conversion into carbonized materials through thermochemical processes offers a sustainable route for waste valorization. In this study, residues were characterized by proximate and elemental analyses, density, porosity, and calorific value. Valorization was performed using microwave-assisted pyrolysis and two hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) routes. Pyrolysis experiments were conducted at 450, 600 and 800 W with residence times of 20–70 min. Conventional HTC was carried out at 180, 200 and 220 °C for 20 h, while autoclave HTC was performed at 134 °C for 2 and 4 h. The resulting biochars and hydrochars were evaluated for their physicochemical and energetic properties and ANOVA was applied to assess the influence of operating conditions. Conventional HTC at higher temperatures produced the highest calorific values, whereas microwave-assisted pyrolysis at 800 W provided competitive HHVs with high solid yields. Autoclave HTC enhanced solid retention and carbon preservation. Among the investigated residues, spent coffee grounds exhibited the most favorable solid-phase energetic performance. These findings demonstrate that thermochemical conversion enables the transformation of common residues into carbon-rich materials with physicochemical and energetic properties relevant for comparative assessment and future application-oriented studies. It should be noted that conventional hydrothermal carbonization experiments were conducted using pre-dried biomass, which represents a methodological limitation of the comparative assessment.
