Fuente: PubMed "pollination" Ecol Appl. 2026 Jan;36(1):e70161. doi: 10.1002/eap.70161.ABSTRACTVegetated field margins generally increase plant biodiversity and connectivity in agricultural landscapes. They can deliver ecosystem services, such as providing food and shelter for insects, or maintaining biotic regulation. But they can also represent a risk, for example by hosting competitor plants or cultivated crop pests. In this work, we evaluated the effects of agricultural practices on indicators of three ecosystem services (providing floral resources for pollinators, reducing soil erosion and conserving plant biodiversity), and one ecosystem disservice (competing with the crop by hosting problematic weeds). We used a French nationwide-scale monitoring network, composed of more than 450 fields of cereals, vineyards, and market gardening. Plant sampling and agricultural practices surveys were conducted from 2013 to 2018. We unambiguously found that pesticide use, at either field or municipality levels, or both, had detrimental effects on ecosystem service indicators. Herbicide use and fertilization quantity decreased floral resources, affecting both their quantity and diversity. Pesticide use was also associated with fewer nature-value species and more problematic weeds. Margin management could also sometimes affect the service and disservice indicators. This work not only increases the knowledge on the unintentional negative impacts of agricultural practices on ecosystem service indicators, and then probably on their delivery, but also demonstrates that pesticide reduction is positively associated with proxies for ecosystem services. It also stresses the fact that these practices have to be implemented at both field and municipality levels.PMID:41494959 | DOI:10.1002/eap.70161